By Marcus Dam
THE HINDU, November 5, 2011 01:22
IST
Is the Trinamool Congress' reaction to
the recent hike in petrol prices about its ‘tolerance' wearing thin or about
fending off charges of complicity?
By threatening to pull out of the
United Progressive Alliance government over the recent hike in petrol prices,
the Trinamool Congress leadership is trying to wriggle out of a politically
deleterious situation in which the Centre finds itself, as disaffection mounts
over the spiralling prices of essential items.
Needless to say, the threat is being
made from a position of strength, the Trinamool Congress being the second
largest constituent of the UPA. If carried out, it could pull the rug from
under the feet of the government.
Whether the threat will be carried out
or not is, of course, another matter. But the Prime Minister is certainly in
for some hard bargaining on his return from his overseas tour if the apple-cart
is not to be upset. For, all such threats — by definition in political parlance
— are, for all practical purposes, pressure tactics.
Under attack in recent times from both the
Left parties and, albeit with less stridency, the Bharatiya Janata Party, for
not speaking out against economic polices of the scam-tainted Congress-led
government at the Centre, the Trinamool Congress has found in the fourth hike
in petrol prices this year an opportunity to express its resentment over not
being consulted by the Congress in matters of major consequence, despite being
a constituent of the UPA.
And in one fell swoop, it would also
invalidate claims by her political rivals that she, by being a silent spectator
in the government, is apathetic to the problems of the common man buffeted by
the rise in the prices of essential commodities.
That the Trinamool Congress is peeved
over the Congress riding roughshod over it was made clear in the reminder by
its chairperson and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee that while a
pullout by the party would result in the toppling of the government at the
Centre, it enjoyed a majority on its own and was not dependant on the Congress
to stay in power in West Bengal.
Doubtless, the Congress in West Bengal
plays second fiddle to the Trinamool — a political liaison that has rarely been
harmonious but has survived because of the Congress in New Delhi insisting that
it has. One can already see some more disgruntled sections of the Congress in
the State secretly delighting in Ms. Banerjee's most recent posturing.
“Somebody has to bell the cat. If we
are outside the government, we can at least speak in the interests of the
people,” Ms. Banerjee has remarked. But it would be politically naïve to assume
that the rise in the prices of petroleum products, the growing rate of food
inflation and the consequent burden on the common man are the only reasons for
her grouse.
Ever since assuming power in May, she
has been expressing her displeasure over the Centre for failing to provide her
government with a special financial package that would bail the State economy
out of the bankruptcy it has allegedly inherited. The issue dominates her
rhetoric. Is the pullout threat also a pressure tactic for extracting from the
Centre the financial assistance?
By her own admission, the government of
which her party is a part, has been responsible for the rise in prices of
petroleum products “eleven times in twelve months” which she feels is
“intolerable.” This begs the question why the Trinamool Congress was not as
assertive of its opposition to the price hikes then, the way it is now. If one
goes by what Ms. Banerjee has to say, it is the party's “tolerance” which is
now wearing thin.
Or is it that the Trinamool Congress is
finding it difficult to fend off charges of complicity each time there has been
a rise in prices and of pursing an economic line that is no different from that
of the Congress? For that has been the argument of the Communist Party of India
(Marxist), its principal adversary in West Bengal.
At least the threat of a pullout from
the government and all the hype it generates could be designed to project the
impression that the party is not just sympathetic to the common man's concerns
but that its position in the government should be taken more seriously by the
Congress.
After all, over the past two-and-a-half
years “we have not even been given a room [for the party] in Parliament,” not
to talk of “we not willing to accept the burden [price rise] being thrust on
the people,” according to Ms. Banerjee.
And even before one can doubt the
seriousness of intent, she pre-empts any questions that could be asked in
reference to it. The Trinamool Congress is not “blackmailing or bargaining” as
might be made out by some, Ms. Banerjee, who has always had a penchant for
histrionics, has said. “Forgive us, but we have not done any wrong,” she says,
her hands folded.
No comments:
Post a Comment